The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle simply states that Ælfweard died soon after his father"s death on 17 July 924 and that they were buried together at Winchester. Manuscript D. of the Chronicle specifies that he outlived his father by only 16 days. However, a list of West-Saxon kings in the 12th-century Textus Roffensis mentions him as his father"s successor, with a reign of four weeks.
Number reign is explicitly attributed to him here. He is also described as king in the New Minster Liber Vitae, an 11th-century source based in part on earlier material. The poem had once been considered a near-contemporary authority, but Michael Lapidge has shown this to be based on a misunderstanding of William"s reference to "a certain obviously ancient book".
This conflicting documentation has led to alternative interpretations, some modern historians concluding that he had succeeded his father in preference to his older half-brother Æthelstan, while others maintain that Æthelstan was the only heir to his father.
In the view of Simon Keynes, Ælfweard was recognised as king in Wessex and Æthelstan in Mercia, and although it is possible that Edward intended a division of the kingdom after his death, it is more likely that the leaders of Wessex chose Ælfweard and Mercia set up Æthelstan in opposition. Ælfweard died only 16 days after his father, on 2 August 924 at Oxford, and was buried at the New Minster, Winchester.
Æthelstan still had difficulty in securing acceptance in Wessex, and he was not crowned king of the Anglo-Saxons until 4 September 925.
