Background
Alexander Bickel was born on December 17, 1924, in Bucharest, Rumania, the son of Solomon Bickel, a writer, and Yetta Schafer.
(American democracy is a government of men as well as laws...)
American democracy is a government of men as well as laws, and politics as much as legal precedent determines whether the decisions of the Supreme Court become the policy of society. This is the argument of a provocative book on the Warren Court by one of the country's most distinguished authorities on the Court.
https://www.amazon.com/Politics-Warren-Court-Alexander-Bickel/dp/0060103175?SubscriptionId=AKIAJRRWTH346WSPOAFQ&tag=prabook-20&linkCode=sp1&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=0060103175
(Book by Bickel, Alexander Mordecai)
Book by Bickel, Alexander Mordecai
https://www.amazon.com/Least-Dangerous-Branch-Supreme-Politics/dp/1258079100?SubscriptionId=AKIAJRRWTH346WSPOAFQ&tag=prabook-20&linkCode=sp1&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=1258079100
( Timeless questions about the role of the Supreme Court ...)
Timeless questions about the role of the Supreme Court in the American political and legal system are raised in the late Alexander Bickel’s characteristically astute analysis of the work of the Warren Court. He takes issue with the Court’s view that its role should be to move the American polity in the direction of perfect equality and expresses his preference for "a more faithful adherence to the method of analytical reason, and a less confident reliance on the intuitive capacity to identify the course of progress." First published in 1970, this book made news with its prediction that the Court’s best-known decision, in Brown v. Board of Education, might be headed for "irrelevance." Bickel charged the Court, particularly in its segregation and reapportionment cases, with being irrational, inconsistent, and even incoherent and argued that its decisions would lead to unwise centralization of government. He explored the limitations on the role of the court in stimulating social progress and concluded that the Warren Court had intervened in matters of social policy where the political process, not judicial action, should apply. "Process is what especially concerned him – the relationship between the legal and the political process in a country where the two are uniquely intermixed. If he criticized something done by the courts for the stated purpose of speeding school desegregation, that did not mean that he favored state-imposed racial discrimination; in fact he abhorred it. He was concerned, rather, about trying to solve complicated problems by legal formulas instead of leaving them to the give-and-take of the political process." -- Anthony Lewis
https://www.amazon.com/Supreme-Court-Idea-Progress/dp/0300022395?SubscriptionId=AKIAJRRWTH346WSPOAFQ&tag=prabook-20&linkCode=sp1&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=0300022395
( “This short but provocative volume… is a fitting testim...)
“This short but provocative volume… is a fitting testimony to the author’s extraordinary, though tragically brief, career as a constitutional scholar, lawyer and teacher. In just a hundred and a half literate pages, we are treated to vintage Bickel insight into every major political issue of the decade, from the civil rights movement, to the Warren Court, through the frenetic university upheavals, and―inevitably―to Watergate…. A tapestry woven by a master of subtle color and texture.”―Alan M. Dershowitz, New York Times Book Review “Presents the core of Bickel’s legal and political philosophy…. In the five essays that compose this volume Bickel explores the relationship between morality and law, examining the role of the Constitution and Supreme Court in our political process, the nature of citizenship, the First Amendment, civil disobedience, and the moral authority of the intellectual…. All will be stimulated by Bickel’s thoughtful message.” –Perspective “Bickel wrote with astonishing clarity. It takes no legal training to understand his thinking about the law. Nor does it take a willingness to agree with him. All that’s required of the reader of this important ‘little’ book is a concern that rivals Bickel’s about the future of American society.” –Newsweek “An illuminating, often a moving book, with all of Professor Bickel’s rare ability to bring law to life in vivid words.”―Anthony Lewis Alexander M. Bickel, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School, taught at Yale from 1956 until his death in 1974.
https://www.amazon.com/Morality-Consent-Alexander-M-Bickel/dp/0300021194?SubscriptionId=AKIAJRRWTH346WSPOAFQ&tag=prabook-20&linkCode=sp1&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=0300021194
Alexander Bickel was born on December 17, 1924, in Bucharest, Rumania, the son of Solomon Bickel, a writer, and Yetta Schafer.
In 1947 Bickel graduated from City College of New York, where he was a member of Phi Beta Kappa, and two years later earned an LL. B. , summa cum laude, at Harvard Law School.
Bickel served in a variety of judicial clerkships and public policy roles, beginning in 1949-1950 as law clerk to Chief Judge Calvert Magruder on the U. S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in Boston, Massachussets. In 1950 he became a law officer in the U. S. State Department and in 1952 began a one-year term as law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter. Bickel returned to the State Department in 1953 as a special assistant to the director of the policy planning staff. The next year he returned to Harvard University as a research associate in the law school and began work on his first book, The Unpublished Opinions of Mr. Justice Brandeis, which was published in 1957.
In 1956 he began a distinguished career as a professor of law at Yale University. Described by his students as "mesmeric, " "bright, witty, and off-putting, all at the same time, " Bickel was as much admired for his energetic and urbane lecturing style as he was for the intellectual subtlety of his case analysis. By 1960 he was a full professor. Six years later he was named Chancellor Kent Professor of Law and Legal History. From 1971 to 1974 he was William C. DeVane Professor and, in 1974, became Sterling Professor of Law. He delivered the Oliver Wendell Holmes lectures at Harvard in 1969 and spent the next academic year as a fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in Behavioral Sciences in California.
A constitutional conservative, Bickel rejected absolutist doctrines as dangerously confining and as conducive to tyranny. In his years at Yale, he moved steadily toward a rejection of judicial activism in establishing social policy on the ground that any such exercise of judicial power was both unworkable and intolerable. His scholarly writing was directed toward both a historical analysis of the Supreme Court and an assessment of its present-day role in American life. His books include The Least Dangerous Branch (1962), Politics and the Warren Court (1965), and Reform and Continuity (1971). He died before completing a two-volume history of the Courtin the early twentieth century. The Morality of Consent, seen by some critics as a preliminary summary of his legal philosophy, was published posthumously in 1975.
Bickel was a contributing editor of The New Republic from 1957 until his death, and a commentator for magazines such as Commentary. In 1961 he bitterly attacked John F. Kennedy's appointment of Robert F. Kennedy to the post of attorney general, declaring that RFK was not fit for the office. In 1968, however, in the midst of the Vietnam War, he traveled across the country speaking in behalf of RFK's insurgent campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination. In a wry aside to a reporter who had called attention to his earlier statement, Bickel said he was considering publishing a list of good presidents who were "not fit to be Attorney General. "
As a public man and policymaker, appearing on television broadcasts, at national gatherings, and in congressional hearings in the 1960's, he was a fervent supporter of civil rights activism and a forceful advocate of integration in education, housing, recreation, and employment. A decade later Bickel concluded that programs leading to integration and assimilation were not working, and were perhaps unlikely to work in the near future. In the Holmes lectures at Harvard in 1969, later expanded and published as The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress, he argued that the key to improving the condition of blacks and other minorities in the United States was not to be found in court doctrines or intervention by the federal government. Relief, he said, lay in local autonomy, in community participation, and in quality education controlled by parents, even if that education was delivered in segregated schools or the political involvement of minorities was achieved through weighted voting in violation of the established principle of one person, one vote.
Bickel's role as a lawyer (as distinct from his academic role as an authority on the Constitution) was equally complex because he often took unexpected positions in the cases he helped to litigate as lead lawyer or consultant. In his best-known court appearance, he successfully defended the New York Times against the Nixon White House in the Pentagon Papers case of 1971, in which the administration had sought, through prior restraint, to prevent publication of documents and memos relating to the government's policies in Vietnam on the ground that publication threatened national security. To the dismay of some civil libertarians, Bickel ignored the doctrine that the First Amendment provided absolute freedom of the press and pursued instead the more pragmatic argument that publication of the papers did not represent a clear and present danger to the nation. He told the Supreme Court that if the president should possess the inherent power to exercise prior restraint, he could do so only when there was a "direct, immediate, and visible" result that threatened the nation's very existence. No such result, he said, would flow from printing the Pentagon Papers as the New York Times proposed to do. The Court agreed by a vote of six to three. Bickel succumbed to cancer in New Haven, Connecticut, at the age of forty-nine.
Alexander Bickel was well established as one of the preeminent legal scholars of his generation. He was an expert on the United States Constitution and one of the most influential constitutional commentators. Bickel was also famous through his writings which addressed such varied topics as citizenship, civil disobedience, freedom of speech, moral authority and intellectual thought. His best works were The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress (1970) and The Morality of Consent (1975).
( Timeless questions about the role of the Supreme Court ...)
(American democracy is a government of men as well as laws...)
( “This short but provocative volume… is a fitting testim...)
(Book by Bickel, Alexander Mordecai)
Bickel most often reflected a liberal Democratic viewpoint, but he was far from doctrinaire.
Bickel was a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
On October 17, 1959, Bickel married Josephine Ann Napolino, with whom he had two children.