Education
University of Cambridge. University of New York
( In Salvation and Sin, David Aers continues his study of...)
In Salvation and Sin, David Aers continues his study of Christian theology in the later Middle Ages. Working at the nexus of theology and literature, he combines formidable theological learning with finely detailed and insightful close readings to explore a cluster of central issues in Christianity as addressed by Saint Augustine and by four fourteenth-century writers of exceptional power. Salvation and Sin explores various modes of displaying the mysterious relations between divine and human agency, together with different accounts of sin and its consequences. Theologies of grace and versions of Christian identity and community are its pervasive concerns. Augustine becomes a major interlocutor in this book: his vocabulary and grammar of divine and human agency are central to Aers' exploration of later writers and their works. After the opening chapter on Augustine, Aers turns to the exploration of these concerns in the work of two major theologians of fourteenth-century England, William of Ockham and Thomas Bradwardine. From their work, Aers moves to his central text, William Langland's Piers Plowman, a long multigeneric poem contributing profoundly to late medieval conversations concerning theology and ecclesiology. In Langland's poem, Aers finds a theology and ethics shaped by Christology where the poem's modes of writing are intrinsic to its doctrine. His thesis will revise the way in which this canonical text is read. Salvation and Sin concludes with a reading of Julian of Norwich's profound, compassionate, and widely admired theology, a reading which brings her Showings into conversation both with Langland and Augustine. “David Aers's Salvation and Sin is an important and provocative book. It throws a particularly enticing gauntlet down to medievalists, daring us to return with Aers to the primary texts, to think with key authors, and to subject literary texts to a logical scrutiny as powerful as that we apply to theology. Beautifully organized and written, his book is a model of scholarship in its learning, clarity, and humility.” —Lynn Staley, Colgate University “In Salvation and Sin Aers continues to break new ground in his ongoing discussion of Christology and ecclesiology in medieval literature and culture. His reading of Langland and Julian is rooted in a bold and refreshing approach to Augustine that serves as a powerful corrective to the dominant, Pelagian view of theology in Piers Plowman, one that leads the reader to embrace a new understanding of how Langland imagines divine will and human agency.” —Jim Rhodes, Southern Connecticut University “David Aers does not reconstruct an Augustinianism for the fourteenth century—an exercise that would have been an ode to an empty abstraction. Instead he begins with a profound reading of Augustine's own struggle to acknowledge the patient work of grace. He then goes on to refract this reading through the theological inventions of William of Ockham, Thomas Bradwardine, William Langland, and Julian of Norwich. The result is, at one level, a rich grammar of incipiently modern theologies; at another, it is the amplification of an original inspiration. Some of our best theologians are apparently residing in English departments.” —James Wetzel, Villanova University
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0268020337/?tag=2022091-20
(Concentrating on the sacrament of the altar, poverty, and...)
Concentrating on the sacrament of the altar, poverty, and conflicting versions of sanctity, Sanctifying Signs presents a critical study of Christian literature, theology, and culture in late medieval England. In this notable book, David Aers considers the diverse ways in which certain late medieval Christians and their Church engaged the immense resources of the Christian tradition in their own historical moment. Using a wide range of texts, Aers explores the complex theological, institutional, and political processes that shape and preserve tradition during changing circumstances. He is particularly interested in why some texts were judged by the late medieval Church to be orthodox and others heretical, and the effect of these judgments on the conversations and debates of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Sanctifying Signs begins with accounts of the sacrament of the altar that were deemed orthodox in the late medieval Church. Aers then shifts his focus to the relationship between sanctification and the sign of poverty. Finally, he reflects on the relationship between some versions of domesticity and sanctification. Texts of William Langland, John Wyclif, Walter Brut, Willia
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0268020221/?tag=2022091-20
University of Cambridge. University of New York
He has published widely on literature, sacramental culture and ideology in medieval and Renaissance England. He did undergraduate study at Cambridge University and earned his doctorate at University of New York He is a former editor of the Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies.
Aers taught at the University of East Anglia before going to Duke in the mid-1990s.
In 1998 he was awarded the Trinity College Distinguished Teaching Award. The academic parceling up of these subjects can become an impediment to studying what I want to study, so that"s the motive for interdisciplinarity.
When I think about ethics, I can"t help but think about politics. The questions I"m asking go directly across what have grown up as disciplinary boundaries within the modern academy.".
(Concentrating on the sacrament of the altar, poverty, and...)
( In Salvation and Sin, David Aers continues his study of...)
His most influential work traces the influence of the Church Fathers in late medieval and early modern poetry and culture to work out questions of politics, gender, and social ethics. In an interview that shortly followed the award, he is quoted as saying, "My work moves between literature, theology, politics and history.
"New Historicism and the Eucharist", Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 33 (2): 241-259, 2003.