Background
Finnis, John Mitchell was born on July 28, 1940 in Adelaide, Australia. Son of Maurice Meredith Steriker and Margaret McKellar (Stewart) Finnis.
(First published in 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights i...)
First published in 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights is widely heralded as a seminal contribution to the philosophy of law, and an authoritative restatement of natural law doctrine. It has offered generations of students and other readers a thorough grounding in the central issues of legal, moral, and political philosophy from Finnis's distinctive perspective. This new edition includes a substantial postscript by the author, in which he responds to thirty years of discussion, criticism and further work in the field to develop and refine the original theory.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B008W6YQR2/?tag=2022091-20
(This launch volume in the Founders of Modern Political an...)
This launch volume in the Founders of Modern Political and Social Thought series presents a critical examination of Aquinas's thought, combining an accessible, historically-informed account of his work with an assessment of his central ideas and arguments. John Finnis presents a richly-documented critical review of Aquinas's thought on morality, politics, law, and method in social science. Unique in his coverage of both primary and secondary texts and his vigorous argumentation on many themes, the author focuses on the philosophy in Aquinas's texts, and demonstrates how this interconnects with the theological elements. Finnis shows how Aquinas, despite some medieval limitations, makes clear and profound contributions to present debates.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0198780850/?tag=2022091-20
(First published in 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights i...)
First published in 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights is widely heralded as a seminal contribution to the philosophy of law, and an authoritative restatement of natural law doctrine. It has offered generations of students and other readers a thorough grounding in the central issues of legal, moral, and political philosophy from Finnis's distinctive perspective. This new edition includes a substantial postscript by the author, in which he responds to thirty years of discussion, criticism and further work in the field to develop and refine the original theory. The book closely integrates the philosophy of law with ethics, social theory and political philosophy. The author develops a sustained and substantive argument; it is not a review of other people's arguments but makes frequent illustrative and critical reference to classical, modern, and contemporary writers in ethics, social and political theory, and jurisprudence. The preliminary First Part reviews a century of analytical jurisprudence to illustrate the dependence of every descriptive social science upon evaluations by the theorist. A fully critical basis for such evaluations is a theory of natural law. Standard contemporary objections to natural law theory are reviewed and shown to rest on serious misunderstandings. The Second Part develops in ten carefully structured chapters an account of: basic human goods and basic requirements of practical reasonableness, community and 'the common good'; justice; the logical structure of rights-talk; the bases of human rights, their specification and their limits; authority, and the formation of authoritative rules by non-authoritative persons and procedures; law, the Rule of Law, and the derivation of laws from the principles of practical reasonableness; the complex relation between legal and moral obligation; and the practical and theoretical problems created by unjust laws. A final Part develops a vigorous argument about the relation between 'natural law', 'natural theology' and 'revelation' - between moral concern and other ultimate questions.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0199599149/?tag=2022091-20
(Providing a rigorous and objective ethical analysis of nu...)
Providing a rigorous and objective ethical analysis of nuclear deterrence, this book discusses such issues as the Soviet menace, possible holocaust, and strategic imperatives. At the same time, the authors unmask types of deterrence that they perceive essentially as moral evasions, maintaining that deterrence cannot be bluffing, pure counterforce, the lesser (or greater) evil, or a step towards disarmament. Concluding that deterrence is unjustifiable, this book examines the new questions of conscience that this raises for us all.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0198247915/?tag=2022091-20
(Are we entitled to be confident that our moral judgements...)
Are we entitled to be confident that our moral judgements can be objective? Can they express insights into aspects of reality, rather than mere feelings, tastes, desires, decisions, upbringing, or conventions? Why must we consider some of our choices to be free, and how do our free choices matter? How far should our moral judgements be based on assessments of expected consequences? Can utilitarianism, and other consequentialist or proportionalist theories, be anything more than the rationalization of positions taken on other grounds? The main theme of this book is the challenge to ethics from philosophical scepticism and from contemporary forms of consequentialism. But in seeking to meet this challenge, the book develops a sustained philosophical argument about many of the central questions of ethics. It reviews classical positions, and challenges some long-influential interpretations of those positions. It also reviews and participates in some recent developments and controversies in Anglo-American ethical theory. The activity of ethical theorizing itself is shown to be a matter of free and intelligent decision, in pursuit of intelligible good; it thus provides a test-case for any ethical theory.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0878404082/?tag=2022091-20
( Moral Absolutes sets forth a vigorous but careful criti...)
Moral Absolutes sets forth a vigorous but careful critique of much recent work in moral theology. It is illustrated with examples from the most controversial aspects of Christian moral doctrine, and a frank account is given of the roots of the upheaval in Roman Catholic moral theology in and after the 1960s. Essential reading for students of theology, ethics, and philosophy. McGivney Lectures. PRAISE FOR THE BOOK: "A very valuable resource for both critics and defenders of traditional moral theology."― Theological Book Review
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0813207452/?tag=2022091-20
(Will be shipped from US. Used books may not include compa...)
Will be shipped from US. Used books may not include companion materials, may have some shelf wear, may contain highlighting/notes, may not include CDs or access codes. 100% money back guarantee.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01A0CAYWG/?tag=2022091-20
(First published in 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights i...)
First published in 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights is widely heralded as a seminal contribution to the philosophy of law, and an authoritative restatement of natural law doctrine. It has offered generations of students and other readers a thorough grounding in the central issues of legal, moral, and political philosophy from Finnis's distinctive perspective. This new edition includes a substantial postscript by the author, in which he responds to thirty years of discussion, criticism and further work in the field to develop and refine the original theory.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B008X9FJ10/?tag=2022091-20
university teacher and barrister
Finnis, John Mitchell was born on July 28, 1940 in Adelaide, Australia. Son of Maurice Meredith Steriker and Margaret McKellar (Stewart) Finnis.
Saint Peters College at Adelaide University (1957). Adelaide University (Bachelor of Laws, 1961). Oxford University (Doctor of Philosophy, 1965).
Associate, University of California, Berkeley, 1965-1966;
fellow, U. College, Oxford, England, since 1966;
lecturer in law, University of Oxford, 1967-1972;
reader in law, University of Oxford, 1972-1989;
professor of law and legal philosophy, University of Oxford, since 1989. Professor of law U. Malawi, 1976-1978. Biolchini Professor Law Notre Dame Law School, since 1995.
Special advisor foreign affairs committee House of Commons, London, 1980-1982. Consultant Pontifical Commission Iustitia et Pax, Vatican City, 1977-1989. Member Pontifical Council Iustitia et Pax, 1990-1995.
Member International Theological Commission, Vatican, 1986-1992. Huber distinguished visiting professor Boston College Law School, 1993-1994.
(Are we entitled to be confident that our moral judgements...)
(This launch volume in the Founders of Modern Political an...)
(First published in 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights i...)
(First published in 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights i...)
(First published in 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights i...)
(Providing a rigorous and objective ethical analysis of nu...)
( Moral Absolutes sets forth a vigorous but careful criti...)
(Will be shipped from US. Used books may not include compa...)
Finnis is a major natural law theorist according to whom there is an ideal higher than positive law in terms of which the legal structure of a society can be appraised. After a survey of anthropological research, he concludes that diverse human societies share common concerns. On the basis of this he posits seven basic goods in terms of which morality, justice and law are understood. These basic goods are life, knowledge, play, aesthetic experience, sociability or friendship, practical reasonableness and religion understood as ‘recognition of, and concern about an order of things "beyond" each and every man'. These goods are objective, basic, fundamental, premoral and self evident. They are objective since all human societies exhibit a concern for these goods. They are basic since all other values, such as courage, gentleness and moderation, are means of pursuing the basic goods and hence subordinate to them. They are fundamental in that all goods have equal status: there is no priority of value amongst the goods since each acquires a priority when viewed from a certain perspective. The goods are premoral since they are not moral obligations or recommendations or prescriptions, even though they provoke the 'evaluative substratum for all moral judgements’. They are self evident since they are obvious to the questioning mind. The premoral basic goods are transformed into a theory of morality by a set of principles consisting of basic requirements of practical reasonableness. These principles are: a coherent life plan, no arbitrary preferences among the seven basic goods, no arbitrary preferences among persons, detachment, commitment, efficiency within reason, respect for every basic value in every act, fostering the common good of the community, following one’s conscience, and to choose real goods to apparent goods. Finnis regards law as an aspect of practical reasonableness, that works for the common good of the community. The moral authority of the law, for him, ‘depends.. on its justice or at least its ability to secure justice’. What status do unjust laws have in Finnis's theory? Are these laws invalid because they are unjust? Is there any obligation on the part of citizens to obey unjust laws? Finnis is aware that law can, at times, work against the common good. According to him, the laws that are unjust lack moral authority and therefore an unjust law. None the less there may be a moral obligation on the part of the citizens to obey them for practical reasons since disobedience of the law may weaken the authority of the ruler and result in harm to the common good. A problem with Finnis’s natural law theory is that it commits the fallacy of deriving an ‘ought’ from an ‘is’: normative statements are derived from statements of fact lacking value content. However, according to Finnis, this is not true of his theory, since what is offered is not based purely on the observance of human nature but is also based on being a human being. The primary grasp of what is good for us is a practical grasp. Although Finnis provides impressively comprehensive lists of basic goods and basic requirements of practical reasonableness it is questionable whether these are sufficient to provide clear guidance in moral dilemmas. Is it not the case that there are situations where, for instance, it may not be possible to respect each basic value in every act, or to follow one's conscience?
Member joint bioethical committee Catholic Bishops England and Wales, Scotland andIreland, 1981-1988. Vice chairman Linacre Center (for Medical Ethics), London,1986-1996. Fellow The British Academy.
Married Marie Carmel McNally, June 20, 1964. Children: Rachel, John-Paul, Catherine, Maria, Jerome, Edmund.