Career
He is known for his work in front of abortion clinics to stop women from having abortions, and for teaching other people to work against legal abortion. Scheidler was the chief defendant in the litigation, filed in a 1986. A Federal Court decided against him and in favor of the National Organization for Women in 1998.
He was found guilty of interstate racketeering, assessed fines and sentenced to prison.
This decision was unanimously overturned by the United States Supreme Court in 2003, but National Organization for Women took the case under a slightly different issue before another lower Federal Court, and it was again decided against Scheidler. However, this was again brought to the Supreme Court which again unanimously decided in his favor in 2006.
The Court granted him damages against National Organization for Women.
In 1986 the National Organization for Women (National Organization for Women) filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court against a host of Pro-Life groups and individuals including the Pro-Life Action Network (PLAN) and Scheidler, among others The suit was filed under the claim that Scheidler and the other defendants had violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Acting (RICO) through a conspiracy to prevent women from accessing abortion services through the threat of violence or the implied threat of violence.
The district court dismissed the case on the grounds that an organization without an academic motive (such as the Pro-Life Action League, a non-profit organization) could not be considered a "racketeering enterprise" under RICO. However, the case was then brought to the Court of Appeals where it was determined that a non-profit organization could, in fact, be considered a racketeering enterprise.
This was confirmed by the Supreme Court in 1994, in a 9-0 vote in favor of National Organization for Women. This allowed the original case to move forward. The decision did not make any statements about whether or not Scheidler and PLAN were guilty of the racketeering allegations, however. lieutenant simply stated that they could be tried under RICO. A trial began in 1998 to determine whether the allegations against Scheidler and PLAN were true, and if they were, in fact, violations of RICO and the Hobbs Acting (this was added as a predicate).
lieutenant was the role of National Organization for Women to prove that there had been a national effort by PLAN to prevent women from accessing abortion clinics through violence or the threat thereof.
After National Organization for Women"s testimonies, the jury decided unanimously that PLAN was guilty. The court awarded monetary compensation to National Organization for Women, and also ruled that PLAN was forbidden to interfere with National Organization for Women"s right to provide abortion services.
PLAN appealed to the seventh circuit under the claim that they had not violated the Hobbs Acting. The act explicitly defines extortion as obtaining property, and PLAN argued that at no point had they taken property from National Organization for Women. This claim was rejected, and PLAN took it to the Supreme Court.
The court voted 8-1 in favor of Scheidler and PLAN. lieutenant ruled that PLAN, while depriving abortion clinics of property, did not actually acquire anything, meaning PLAN did not commit extortion under the Hobbs Acting.
