Background
Martin Hollis was the son of a diplomat, and nephew of the MI5 director-general Roger Hollis.
(Does trust grow fragile when people are too rational or w...)
Does trust grow fragile when people are too rational or when they are not rational enough? Both thoughts are plausible. Which is right depends on how we define "reason." Martin Hollis' elegant and distinctive study argues for an interpretation of "reason" as putting the common good before one's own. This offers a universal reciprocity to people who then choose what reason shall mean for them.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/052158681X/?tag=2022091-20
(The book is in three parts with a section of keywords. Pa...)
The book is in three parts with a section of keywords. Part I covers individual choice , Part II examines interactive choice . The final part covers interactive choice .
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0631183221/?tag=2022091-20
(A collaboration between a philosopher and an internationa...)
A collaboration between a philosopher and an international relations scholar, this work examines the philosophical issues that underlie the theory of international relations. Part I focuses on the dominant theories of Idealism, Realism, and Behavioralism, and Part II examines the international system, the state, bureaucracies, and the individual--four factors commonly assumed to account for international behavior. The authors conclude with a summary of the links between the two forms of analysis and an open-ended assessment of their relative merits which will stimulate further discussion.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0198275897/?tag=2022091-20
(In this book, the author is attempting to make sense, as ...)
In this book, the author is attempting to make sense, as a philosopher, of the ideas of rationality put forward by economists, sociologists, and political theorists. The book intervenes in intense current debates within and among several disciplines. Its concern is with the true nature of social actors and the proper character of social science. Its arguments are the more challenging for being presented in simple, incisive, and lucid prose.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0521270391/?tag=2022091-20
(Did Adam and Eve act rationally in eating the fruit of th...)
Did Adam and Eve act rationally in eating the fruit of the forbidden tree? That can seem to depend solely on whether they had found the best means to their ends, in the spirit of the "economic" theories of rationality. In these essays, culled in revised form from twenty-five years' work, Martin Hollis argues that social action cannot be understood by viewing human beings as abstract individuals with preferences in search of satisfaction, or by divorcing practical reason from questions of the rationality of norms, principles, practices and ends.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0521447798/?tag=2022091-20
(All social theorists and philosophers who seek to explain...)
All social theorists and philosophers who seek to explain human action have a 'model of man'; a metaphysical view of human nature that requires its own theory of scientific knowledge. In this influential book, Martin Hollis examines the tensions that arise from the differing views of sociologists, economists and psychologists. He then develops a rationalist model of his own which connects personal and social identity through a theory of rational action and a priori knowledge, allowing humans to both act freely and still be a subject for scientific explanation. Presented in a fresh series livery and including a specially commissioned preface written by Geoffrey Hawthorn, Hollis's important work is made available to a new generation of readers.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1107534372/?tag=2022091-20
philosopher university professor
Martin Hollis was the son of a diplomat, and nephew of the MI5 director-general Roger Hollis.
From 1961 to 1963 he studied at Berkeley and Harvard on a Harkness Fellowship, encountering sociology in California and the work of Quine and Rawls at Harvard, and meeting his future wife Patricia Wells, subsequently Baroness Hollis of Heigham.
Educated at Winchester, he did national service in the Royal Artillery before reading Philosophy, Politics and Economics (Group of the European People's Party (Christian-Democratic Group)) at New College, Oxford from 1958 to 1961. Returning to England, Hollis worked from 1963 to 1966 at the Foreign Office. "Sent to Heidelberg to learn German, he returned to find himself posted to Moscow.
This was the last straw for a rational man, who was already moonlighting in Oxford, giving philosophy tutorials at New College and Balliol.
He left the Foreign and Commonwealth Office." Appointed to a philosophy post at the new University of East Anglia in 1967, he remained in Norwich until his death. In 1972 he became Senior Lecturer, and in 1981 Professor.
From 1980 to 1987 he was editor of Ratio. He combined teaching and research with an increasing level of university administration, becoming Pro-Vice-Chancellor of the University in 1992.
Foreign ten years he was also a Norwich Justice of the Peace. Hollis was also a keen player of games.
He was a chess-player of a very high standard, played competitive bridge, and was also interested in designing new games. All of this was not just a hobby but derived from his interest in rationality and choice, and the paradoxes that rationality throws up, something he increasingly explored in his later work. He was also fond of puzzles, especially creating logic puzzles, and published them prolifically in a variety of publications including Cogito and New Scientist.
(A collection of the latter was published as Tantalizers in 1970).
(Did Adam and Eve act rationally in eating the fruit of th...)
(All social theorists and philosophers who seek to explain...)
(A collaboration between a philosopher and an internationa...)
(In this book, the author is attempting to make sense, as ...)
(Does trust grow fragile when people are too rational or w...)
(The book is in three parts with a section of keywords. Pa...)
O"Hagan argues that central to Hollis"s rationalism was "the epistemological unity of mankind", the view that "some beliefs are universal.. There are, because there have to be, percepts and concepts shared by all who can understand each other." This rationalism, of Hollis, was in its early formulations strongly influenced by Peter Strawson and applied to understanding and explaining the approach of the social sciences.