Background
Pherozeshah Mehta was probably born in Bombay on 4 August 1845, of respectable middleclass Parsi parents.
(This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. T...)
This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1149982241/?tag=2022091-20
(Excerpt from Speeches and Writings of the Honorable Sir P...)
Excerpt from Speeches and Writings of the Honorable Sir Pherozeshah M. Mehta, K. C. I.e: With an Introduction James Bryce, Studies in Contemporary Biography, p, 430, etc. Mr. Bryce of Gladstone His readiness, not only at catching a point, but at making the most of it on a moment's notice, was amazing. Never was he seen at a loss either to meet a new point raised by an adversary or to make the best of an unexpected incident. Sometimes he would amuse himself by drawing a cheer or a contradiction from his opponents, and would then suddenly turn round and use this hasty expression of their opinion as the basis for a fresh argument of his own. Loving con?ict, he loved debate, and, so far from being confused or Worried by the strain con?ict put upon him, his physical health was strengthened and his faculties were roused to higher efficiency by having to prepare and deliver a great speech.' Who can gainsay that the same high qualities in nearly as rich measure distinguish Sir Pherozeshah as a debater? And it is also true of him, what Mr. Bryce says of Gladstone, that 'the dignity and spontaneity which marked the substance of his speeches was no less conspicuous in their delivery. No thing could be more easy and graceful than his manner on ordinary occasions, nothing more grave and stately than it became when he was making a ceremonial refer ence to some public event or bestowing a meed of praise on the departed.' About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1527933385/?tag=2022091-20
(Excerpt from The Bombay Municipal Reform Question, 1871: ...)
Excerpt from The Bombay Municipal Reform Question, 1871: A Speech Delivered at a Meeting of the Bench of Justices, Held on Friday 21st June, 1871; And a Paper Read Before a Meeting of the Bombay Branch of the East India Association, Held on the 20th November, 1871 For let us examine these resolutions calmly and carefully, and I venture to say that we shall not have far to go to point out that actual experience has already shown that they are impotent for any real purpose of municipal reform. I think that the criticism of the essential point of Mr. Forbes's proposals contained in the first part of the amendment proposed by Captain Hancock, hits, ao curately a very great defect in Mr. Forbes's plan. I agree with Captain Hancock in thinking that to vest the exe cutive authority in a Town Council assisted by a Secre tary, is the resuscitation of a plan already tried and con demned by experience as wrong in principle and inefficient in practice. I must say with all due deference, that Mr. Nowrojee Furdoonjee's indignant disclaimer against in stituting any comparison between the old Board of Con servancy and the proposed Town Council was charac terized more by assertion than by argument. He did not even attempt to show what essential difference there was between the old Board and the present proposed Town Council that could justify the hope that the latter would succeed where the former had failed. Nor was his comparison with the Town Council of Liverpool more conclusive. I have no doubt that Mr. Nowrojee Fur doonjee took very great pains to make himself intimately acquainted with the constitution and working of that beau-ideal of his, of the Town Council of Liverpool, but when he proceeded to predict a promising future for the Town Council of Mr. Forbes's scheme from the proved excellence of the Liverpool Town Council, on the ground that they were similar, the only difference being that the latter was founded upon the elective principle, I also had no 'doubt that Mr. Nowrojee had familiarized himself with another English institution, the practice so well known to English shopkeepers of urging the irresistible argument of only a guinea. On that principle you could easily prove that a dead body was as good as a living body, the only difference being that the latter had What the former had not, a life, a vital principle. If he thought so little of this difference, What he ought to have com pared his Town Council with, were the Town Councils of the English boroughs before the elective principle was universally introduced in them by the Municipal Cor poration Act of 1835, characterized by the Commissioners appointed to enquire into them as. At once inefiicient. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1333369042/?tag=2022091-20
Pherozeshah Mehta was probably born in Bombay on 4 August 1845, of respectable middleclass Parsi parents.
He was one of the first Indians to secure Western higher education and the first Parsi to take the master's degree.
He also became a barrister-at-law in London, where he absorbed the ideals of Gladstonian liberalism, which thereafter guided his political life. By 1872 Mehta was prominent in the Bombay municipality, and it was to his leadership that the city owed its Magna Charta, the Act of 1888. The Duke of Connaught stated that the municipal constitution of Bombay was the product of Mehta's genius. Mehta was also the founder of the Bombay Presidency Association, which, under his tutelage from 1885 to 1915, was the organizational arm of the National Congress in Bombay. In 1886 he was appointed to the Bombay Legislative Council, where he was noted for his upright and independent character and his willingness to fight for a just cause. He also came to be noted as a splendid orator. In 1911 Mehta was chosen president of the Bombay municipality, in which he had played so prominent a role for so many years. In 1898 he was named to the Imperial Legislative Council and served with distinction until poor health forced his resignation. Mehta was active in the founding of the Indian National Congress in 1885. He continued to play a prominent role in the affairs of the Congress until his death. In 1890, and again in 1909, he was chosen president of the Congress. For undisclosed reasons he resigned the presidency a few days before the sessions began. On two other occasions he served as chairman of the important Reception Committee, which, in those days, dominated the proceedings. A man of broad interests, Mehta was also an elected member of the senate of Bombay University and served on the board of several pioneer Indian business concerns. His career was summarized by a leading British journalist who said that Mehta "had stood alone against the bureaucracy, had displayed a courage equal to Gokhale's, an eloquence hardly second to Surendranath Banerjea's, and power of sarcasm hardly rivaled by Motilal Ghoses's. " He continued to exert great influence in the last years of his life. In 1914, when Gopal Krishna Gokhale was on the verge of arranging a harmonious resolution of the serious rift in the ranks of the Congress, it was Pherozeshah Mehta who sent an emissary to advise Gokhale against the move. Gokhale bowed to Mehta's opinion, and the rupture was not healed.
Sir Pherozeshah Mehta was one of the founders of the Indian National Congress, a member of the Imperial Legislative Council of India, and an outstanding leader of the Bombay municipality.
In Mumbai, even today Mehta is much revered; there are roads, halls and law colleges named after him. He is respected as an important inspiration for young Indians of the era, his leadership of India's bar and legal profession, and for laying the foundations of Indian involvement in political activities and inspiring Indians to fight for more self-government.
(Excerpt from The Bombay Municipal Reform Question, 1871: ...)
(Excerpt from Speeches and Writings of the Honorable Sir P...)
(This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. T...)
member of the Imperial Legislative Council
Quotes from others about the person
When Mehta died, the viceroy described him as "a great Parsi, a great citizen, great patriot, and a great Indian. "