Career
His contribution was noted by Ricardo and Marx and brought to wider attention via Sraffa"s editing of the formers" collected works. Ravenstone"s true identity was suggested by Sraffa to be Richard Puller (1789–1831). He contributed to the economic debates of the 1820s in England.
Edwin Seligman credits him with being "the earliest advocate of the surplus value theory later adopted by Marx." Joseph Dorfman argued from circumstantial evidence that Ravenstone was a Review
Edward Edwards. Noel West. Thompson in reviewing Sraffa"s case and other evidence concludes that there is no compelling reason now to contest the identification with Richard Puller the younger (not his father of the same name). Ravenstone published at least two writings in economic theory, A Few Doubts as to the Correctness of the Opinions generally maintained on the Subjects of Population and Political Economy in 1821, and Thoughts on the Funding System and its Effects, in 1824.
Seligman writes that the former work contained criticism of Malthusianism which " not differ from other works of the kind." Ravenstone wrote that private property "is the right to the work of one"s own hands," but distinguished this from profit and rent: "But this right is very different from the artificial right by which a man is enabled to appropriate for himself the ownership of lands which he does not occupy, and on which he does not exercise any industry. On this pretension of the landlord are built the pretensions of the merchant-manufacturer, of the tradesman, of the capitalist.
All are founded on the same principle." In this way, Ravenstone claimed, "the labor of the industrious is made subservient to the maintenance of the idle.
The laborer must purchase the permission to be useful." Profits arise "from the surplus product of the productive laborer.".
