Background
Sir Peter le Page Renouf was born in Guernsey on 23 August 1822.
Sir Peter le Page Renouf was born in Guernsey on 23 August 1822.
Renouf was educated at Elizabeth College there, and proceeded to Oxford, which, upon his becoming a Roman Catholic, under the influence of John Henry Newman, he quit without taking a degree as he was unable to subscribe to the Thirty Nine Articles as required in those days.
He opposed the promulgation of the dogma of Papal Infallibility, and his treatise (1868) upon the condemnation of Pope Honorius for heresy by the council of Constantinople in AD 680 was placed upon the index of prohibited books Professorship
He had been from 1855 to 1864 professor of ancient history and Oriental languages in the Roman Catholic university which Newman vainly strove to establish in Dublin, and during part of this period edited the Atlantis and the Home and Foreign Review, which latter had to be discontinued on account of the hostility of the Roman Catholic hierarchy. Renouf was one of the defenders of Champollion and of his method of decipherment of Egyptian hieroglyphics in England when he was being criticized unfairly by other scholars.
Museum directorship
In 1864 he was appointed a government inspector of schools, which position he held until 1886, when his growing celebrity as an Egyptologist procured him the appointment of Keeper of Oriental Antiquities in the British Museum, in succession to Doctor Samuel Birch.
His understudy was East. A. Wallis Budge with whom he had an acrimonious relationship. He didn"t want Budge to succeed him as keeper, through a perceived lack of social skills (Budge didn"t come from a privileged background) and doubts about his abilities, objecting strongly to Budge being appointed as his successor and preferring Edouard Naville instead.
Renouf was elected in 1887 president of the Society of Biblical Archaeology, to whose Proceedings he was a constant contributor. Renouf was removed from his position as Keeper in the British Museum on reaching retirement age despite the signed opposition of twenty-five leading European Egyptologists of the day who wrote to the Prime Minister.
Renouf gave excoriating evidence against Budge in court when the latter was found to have falsely accused Hormuzd Rassam of being corruptly involved in illicit trade of cuneiform tablets.
Renouf continued to feel animosity towards Budge, accusing him of plagiarism and being a charlatan.