Background
There is no particular information about the place and date of his birth.
(This book adds to the environmental politics and policy l...)
This book adds to the environmental politics and policy literature by conducting a comprehensive investigation of business influence in agenda building and environmental policymaking in the United States over time. As part of this investigation, the author presents an analysis of six cases in which private firms were involved in disputes concerning pollution control and natural resource management. In addition to determining how much business interests influence environmental and natural resource policy, the book tests possible explanations for their level of success in shaping the government's agenda and policy. The study offers a general conceptual framework for analyzing the influence of corporate America over environmental policymaking. The research then explores how much firms have influenced Congress, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and certain natural resource agencies, and the courts on environmental and natural issues since the beginning of the environmental movement in 1970. No other study has examined the ability of business to influence environmental policy in all three branches of government and in such detail.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0804748322/?tag=2022091-20
2006
(It is well known that American businesses make an effort ...)
It is well known that American businesses make an effort to influence environmental policy by attempting to set the political agenda and to influence regulations and legislation. This book examines what is not so well known: the extent to which business succeeds in its policy interventions. In Business and Environmental Policy, a team of distinguished scholars systematically analyzes corporate influence at all stages of the policy process, focusing on the factors that determine the success or failure of business lobbying in Congress, state legislatures, local governments, federal and state agencies, and the courts. These experts consider whether business influence is effectively counterbalanced by the efforts of environmental groups, public opinion, and other forces. The book also examines the use of the media to influence public opinion―as in the battle over drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge―and corporations' efforts to sway elections by making campaign contributions. Because the book goes well beyond the existing literature―much of which is narrow, descriptive, and anecdotal―to provide broad-based empirical evidence of corporate influence on environmental policy, it makes an original and important contribution and is appropriate for a variety of undergraduate and graduate courses.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0262612186/?tag=2022091-20
2007
(Strategic Planning in Environmental Regulation introduces...)
Strategic Planning in Environmental Regulation introduces an approach to environmental regulatory planning founded on a creative, interactive relationship between business and government. The authors argue that regulation -- often too narrowly defined as direct, command-and-control standard setting and enforcement -- should include the full range of activities intended to influence private behavior to conform to public goals. The concept of strategic regulatory planning that the book introduces provides a model for designing more effective environmental regulation. Strategic planning requires careful consideration of the regulatory objectives, the target audiences for regulation, and the characteristics of the regulatory agency. The two important case studies in the book -- one on the use of the gasoline additive MTBE and the other on the cleanup of underground storage tanks (USTs) -- apply the model, compare the approaches and results, and illustrate the advantages of a strategic approach. The case of MTBE -- in which an additive intended to produce cleaner-burning gasoline was found to contribute to both air and groundwater pollution -- shows the drawbacks of top-down regulation by fragmented regulatory agencies. The success of the UST cleanup, in contrast, highlights a unique, strategic, and results-oriented approach to policy implementation. These two cases demonstrate why regulation works better in some cases than others, and the alternative approaches to regulation described in the book promise to promote the achievement of environmental quality goals.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0262532751/?tag=2022091-20
2007
(Prior to the Nixon administration, environmental policy i...)
Prior to the Nixon administration, environmental policy in the United States was rudimentary at best. Since then, it has evolved into one of the primary concerns of governmental policy from the federal to the local level. As scientific expertise on the environment rapidly developed, Americans became more aware of the growing environmental crisis that surrounded them. Practical solutions for mitigating various aspects of the crisis - air pollution, water pollution, chemical waste dumping, strip mining, and later global warming - became politically popular, and the government responded by gradually erecting a vast regulatory apparatus to address the issue. Today, politicians regard environmental policy as one of the most pressing issues they face. The Obama administration has identified the renewable energy sector as a key driver of economic growth, and Congress is in the process of passing a bill to reduce global warming that will be one of the most important environmental policy acts in decades. The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Environmental Policy is a state-of-the-art work on all aspects of environmental policy in America. Over the past half century, America has been the world's leading emitter of global warming gases. However, environmental policy is not simply a national issue. It is a global issue, and the explosive growth of Asian countries like China and India mean that policy will have to be coordinated at the international level. The book therefore focuses not only on the U.S., but on the increasing importance of global policies and issues on American regulatory efforts. This is a topic that will only grow in importance in the coming years, and this handbook serves as an authoritative guide to any scholar interested in the issue.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0190465328/?tag=2022091-20
2016
There is no particular information about the place and date of his birth.
Kamieniecki graduated from State University of New York at Buffalo with a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1974. He earned his Master of Arts degree in 1976 and his doctorate in 1978.
During his career, he was also a recipient of grants, including Rockefeller Foundation Fellowship, Argonne National Laboratory Grant, Ford Foundation Fellowship, Haynes Foundation Faculty Fellowship and many others.
Sheldon Kamieniecki started his career as an assistant professor at the department of political science at the California State University at San Bernardino in 1978-1981. Then he went to the University of Southern California, where he worked till 2006. He was also a Chair of the Political Science Department and the founding Director of the Environmental Studies Program at USC.
Between 2006 and 2017, Kamieniecki was a Dean of the Division of Social Sciences at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Since 2017, he works as a Professor Emeritus of the Environmental Studies Department there.
Kamieniecki has published several books on environmental policy. In addition, he has published numerous articles in political science and public policy journals as well as book chapters on local, state, federal, and international environmental policy issues.
Since 1997 he has co-edited a book series for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press on American and Comparative Environmental Policy. Dean Kamieniecki recently published Corporate America and Environmental Policy: How Often Does Business Get Its Way?.
(This book adds to the environmental politics and policy l...)
2006(Strategic Planning in Environmental Regulation introduces...)
2007(It is well known that American businesses make an effort ...)
2007(Prior to the Nixon administration, environmental policy i...)
2016