Background

He was born in Washington, D. C. , the son of Edward Allen Fay, a Dante scholar, and Mary Bradshaw.

Education

He received an M. A. in 1897 and studied at the Sorbonne in 1898.

After bicycling from Paris to Berlin, Fay enrolled for three semesters at Berlin. Using Brandenburg and Hanoverian archives, he wrote a dissertation on the League of Princes, Frederick the Great's defensive alliance against Emperor Joseph II. Fay mailed the dissertation to Cambridge and received a Ph. D. from Harvard in 1900.

In 1914 Fay became a professor at Smith College.

Career

After two years as a teaching fellow, he went to Dartmouth, where he remained until 1914.

Fay became an active citizen of Hanover, New Hampshire, serving on the school board and as coeditor of the town's early records.

In 1898 he had published in the American Historical Review (AHR) a prizewinning essay on Napoleon's abduction and execution of the duc d'Enghien, and at Dartmouth he became a prolific reviewer of works on European history, particularly in the AHR and the Nation.

In 1914 Fay became a professor at Smith College. He founded with John Spencer Bassett the Smith College Studies in History, contributing in 1916 an essay on the early Hohenzollern household and administration; and a year later he published in the AHR a study of the creation of the standing army in Prussia.

But World War I drew him toward contemporary history. He strongly opposed German policy from 1914 to 1918, favored American entry into the war, and supported the breakup of Austria-Hungary. The first of his many studies of the war's background appeared in the AHR in October 1918; using the recently published "Willy-Nicky correspondence, " he criticized sharply the Kaiser's naive attempt at a Russian alliance in 1904 and 1905.

In reports to the House Commission at the Paris Peace Conference, he recommended independence for Poland and Finland and autonomy for the Baltic peoples and the Ukraine, pending later federation with the Soviet Union.

As documentary publications continued to pour forth, Fay grew increasingly dissatisfied with the accepted versions of the war's genesis.

In 1920 and 1921 he published in the AHR three articles entitled "New Light on the Origins of the War, " dealing with the events of July and August 1914. He soon argued that Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty, which attributed the cause of the war to "the aggression of Germany and her allies, " was historically untrue in its implication of Germany's sole guilt.

His reviews became a continuing commentary on the massive new evidence on prewar diplomacy.

In 1927 he interviewed many participants in the events of 1914, including the Kaiser and Admiral von Tirpitz. A year later he published The Origins of the World War. The book was widely read, and many scholars greeted it with enthusiasm; a French translation, which appeared in 1931, elicited some disagreement.

Some otherwise favorable reviews, notably in the AHR and the Times Literary Supplement, criticized Fay's strictly documentary approach and his neglect of such imponderables as popular emotions. Recent scholarship indicates that Fay underestimated German pressure on Austria to act against Serbia and overestimated Germany's last-minute efforts to avert general war.

As an internationally acclaimed authority on diplomacy, Fay was a natural choice for a new joint Harvard-Radcliffe professorship. He returned to Cambridge in 1929 and became very much a public figure. He lectured, attended conferences, and wrote scores of reviews and articles, especially in Current History. W

ith Hitler's accession in 1933, Fay's concern with contemporary Germany increased greatly. After hoping for the moderation of Nazi policies, he firmly opposed the regime, without identifying Germans with Nazis, and without changing his views about World War I.

In the mid-1930's his brand of revisionism--though he dissociated himself from the extreme revisionists of left or right--became widespread. Young American scholars especially favored his views, just as contemporary politicians reflected American disillusionment with foreign involvements. But with the outbreak of World War II, Fay favored aid for the Allies and American intervention, if necessary.

He argued that 1939 was not 1914; that the old, though fragile, unity of the Euro-American world was lost; and that Hitler's Reich was in essence different from and outside of our civilization. However, Fay maintained that a decent Germany might be restored and he opposed destructive peace measures that would prevent Germany's revival.

After 1945 he favored Adenauer's policies, the Schuman plan, and the emergence of a real European community.

Fay retired from Harvard and Radcliffe in 1945, spent a year as visiting professor at Yale, and was elected president of the American Historical Association for the 1946-1947 term.

He continued his scholarly activities and was instrumental in founding the Radcliffe Seminars, a program of adult education in which he taught for several years.

He died in Lexington, Massachussets Fay's Origins of the World War sparked considerable controversy but was for years the foremost scholarly treatment of the subject.

Achievements

• Although he published no other work of similar scope, his many articles, his participation in the editing of the Guide to Historical Literature (1931), and The Rise of Brandenburg-Prussia to 1786 (1937) were important contributions. His stance is supported by several modern-day scholars, such as Christopher Clark, though it remains controversial. Fay left Harvard University (Ph. D. 1900) to study at the Sorbonne and the University of Berlin. He taught at Dartmouth College (1902–14) and Smith College (1914–29) and, after the publication of his major book, at both Harvard and Yale University. Fay's conclusion was that all the European powers shared in the blame, but most of all the system of secret alliances that divided Europe after the Franco-Prussian War into two mutually suspicious camps of group solidarity, Triple Alliance against Triple Entente (Fay's student Allan B. Calhamer, would later develop and publish the game Diplomacy, based on this thesis) but that Austro-Hungary, Serbia and Russia were primarily responsible for the immediate cause of war's outbreak. Other forces besides militarism and nationalism were at work: the economics of imperialism and the newspaper press played roles.

Works

More photos

• book

  • The Origins of the World War. Second Edition, Revised. Two Volumes in One

    (!!!COMES WITH TRACKING!!! RARE RED HADCOVER 578 PAGES CLE...)

  • World History, 1815-1920

    (This book was originally published prior to 1923, and rep...)

  • The origins of the world war,

    (copyright 1930 The writer has no political motive but sim...)

  • Before Sarajevo the Origins of the World War, Volumes 1

    (A wiork of enduring scholarship, Signey Bradshaw Fay's cl...)

  • The Origins of the World War Volume I

    (This is the authoritative work on the causes of World War...)

  • Origins of the World War Volume 2

    (Volume 2 of Fay's classic on the origins of World War I.)

  • The Origins of the World War: After Sarajevo Immediate Causes of the War

    (This is a two volume work. Volume 1 is "Before Sarajevo -...)

  • The Rise of Brandenburg-Prussia to 1786 (Berkshire studies in European history)

Personality

Fay, a wise and gracious man, was loved and respected by students and colleagues alike.

Connections

He married Sarah Proctor in 1904. They had three children.

Father:

Edward Allen Fay

mother Mary Bradshaw

Wife:

Sarah Proctor