Alan Gauld

1932

Portland, Dorset

He taught psychology at Nottingham University and was the President of the Society for Psychical Research from 1989 to 1992. Gauld has generally been skeptical of physical mediumship. He has claimed that ectoplasm materializations seem to "smack very strongly of fraud and conjuring", such as made from cheesecloth or Netto curtain. He states however that he believes there is genuine evidence for movement of objects during séances including the phenomena produced with the medium Daniel Dunglas Home. This is in opposition to other researchers who have declared that Home was fraudulent. During one of the séances there was "spontaneous appearance of images on film", though Gauld discovered that the locked box was "easily opened in the dark, which allowed for easy substitution of film rolls." Gauld"s documents early investigations into paranormal phenomena. The book received a mixed review by Robert Kent Donovan who praised the research of the book but complained that Gauld was biased in support of the authenticity of the findings from the psychical researchers. Gauld"s book documents the history of hypnosis. lieutenant was positively reviewed by medical historian Roger Cooter in the British Medical Journal who recommended it as a "useful reference tool." The book was also positively reviewed by philosopher Peter G. Sobol who wrote that "with its broad coverage and attention to detail, this is an indispensable book for any future work on the history of hypnosis." Psychologist Geoffrey Blowers also praised the book commenting that "he steers a clear path through the large, diverse literature and avoids a partisan stance on the findings to present a lively and informative account of this baffling phenomenon." Psychiatrist Melvin A. Gravitz described the book as a "significant contribution to the field, which will stand as a hallmark of scholarship for many years." He has drawn criticism from historian Ruth Brandon for disputing the confession of the Fox sisters.

Alan Gauld

Edit Profile

psychologist

Background

Gauld was born in Portland, Dorset.

Education

In the late 1950s he attended Harvard University. He obtained an Master of Surgery in 1958 and a Doctor of Philosophy in 1962 from Emmanuel College.

Career

He taught psychology at Nottingham University and was the President of the Society for Psychical Research from 1989 to 1992. Gauld has generally been skeptical of physical mediumship. He has claimed that ectoplasm materializations seem to "smack very strongly of fraud and conjuring", such as made from cheesecloth or Netto curtain.

He states however that he believes there is genuine evidence for movement of objects during séances including the phenomena produced with the medium Daniel Dunglas Home.

This is in opposition to other researchers who have declared that Home was fraudulent. During one of the séances there was "spontaneous appearance of images on film", though Gauld discovered that the locked box was "easily opened in the dark, which allowed for easy substitution of film rolls." Gauld"s documents early investigations into paranormal phenomena.

The book received a mixed review by Robert Kent Donovan who praised the research of the book but complained that Gauld was biased in support of the authenticity of the findings from the psychical researchers. Gauld"s book documents the history of hypnosis.

lieutenant was positively reviewed by medical historian Roger Cooter in the British Medical Journal who recommended it as a "useful reference tool." The book was also positively reviewed by philosopher Peter G. Sobol who wrote that "with its broad coverage and attention to detail, this is an indispensable book for any future work on the history of hypnosis." Psychologist Geoffrey Blowers also praised the book commenting that "he steers a clear path through the large, diverse literature and avoids a partisan stance on the findings to present a lively and informative account of this baffling phenomenon." Psychiatrist Melvin A. Gravitz described the book as a "significant contribution to the field, which will stand as a hallmark of scholarship for many years." He has drawn criticism from historian Ruth Brandon for disputing the confession of the Fox sisters.