Horace for Students of Literature: The Ars Poetica and Its Tradition

( "Original insights into Horace's influential poem."--Ge...)

"Original insights into Horace's influential poem."--George A. Kennedy, Paddison professor of classics and professor of comparative literature, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill The influence of Horace's Ars Poetica on literary criticism across the ages has sometimes manifested itself in straightforward and direct ways and sometimes in a subtler, more oblique fashion.  This volume offers, for the first time, an anthology of important texts, with accompanying commentary, that illustrate this diverse and significant Horatian influence.  The authors demonstrate that what has endured since the first century B.C. in Horace's poetic theory and what has been adapted from it by his successors are themes of permanent value to students of literature and criticism.  Using a series of texts--from the Ars Poetica itself to works by Geoffrey of Vinsauf, Nicolas Boileau, Alexander Pope, Lord Byron, and Wallace Stevens (his Notes Toward a Supreme Fiction)--they show that the voice of the Horatian tradition continues to be heard clearly.  In the Ars Poetica Horace maps out three directions followed by the critics represented here:  one relates to form and style, another to methods of evaluating success and failure in poetry, while a third investigates the essential purpose of poetic activity and the psychology of the creative artist.  O. B. Hardison, Jr., formerly professor of English at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and director of the Folger Shakespeare Library, was professor of English at Georgetown University from 1984 until his death in 1990.  He was the author or editor of many books, including The Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics; Disappearing Through the Skylight: Culture and Technology in the Twentieth Century (winner of the 1990 Los Angeles Times nonfiction book prize); Prosody and Purpose in the English Renaissance; Medieval Literary Criticism:  Translations and Interpretations; and, with Leon Golden, Classical and Medieval Literary Criticism and Aristotle's Poetics: A Translation and Commentary for Students of Literature (UPF, 1981).   Leon Golden is professor of classics and director of the Program in the Humanities at Florida State University.  He is also the author of Aristotle on Tragic and Comic Mimesis, In Praise of Prometheus: Humanism and Rationalism in Aeschylean Thought, and numerous articles and book chapters.

http://www.amazon.com/Horace-Students-Literature-Poetica-Tradition/dp/0813013542?SubscriptionId=AKIAJRRWTH346WSPOAFQ&prabook0b-20&linkCode=sp1&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=0813013542

Understanding The Iliad

(Although the Iliad has a history dating back more than th...)

Although the Iliad has a history dating back more than three thousand years, it remains a riveting and insightful study of universal themes relating to the human condition. This study focuses on three interconnecting subjects: the relationship of human beings to the external forces-the gods-which are operative in the universe; the concept of heroism in war and beyond war which fulfills the human aspiration for meaning in existence; and the process of emotional, intellectual, and psychological evolution by which the poem's hero, Achilles, evolves from a state of narcissistic indifference to the fate of other human beings to the capacity to demonstrate compassion to those who have been his most hated enemies.

http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-The-Iliad-Leon-Golden/dp/142081351X?SubscriptionId=AKIAJRRWTH346WSPOAFQ&prabook0b-20&linkCode=sp1&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=142081351X

Understanding The Iliad by Golden, Leon (2005) Paperback

http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Iliad-Golden-Leon-Paperback/dp/B01181GOEU?SubscriptionId=AKIAJRRWTH346WSPOAFQ&prabook0b-20&linkCode=sp1&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=B01181GOEU

Achilles and Yossarian: Clarity and Confusion in the Interpretation of The Iliad and Catch-22

(Joseph Heller¿s Catch-22 has been interpreted from many d...)

Joseph Heller¿s Catch-22 has been interpreted from many different vantage points in the nearly fifty years since it was first published. One approach that has not been effectively used has been to consider the influence of Homer¿s Iliad on Heller¿s novel. From teaching a Humanities seminar in war literature some years ago I had become convinced that this Homeric influence existed and I wrote to the late Mr. Heller to see if he would confirm this impression of mine. In a letter which I received from him in 1994 he stated that he had been thinking about the Iliad all of the time he was writing Catch-22 but wanted to avoid obvious comparisons. He confirmed to me his interest in the Iliad in personal conversations I had the privilege to have with him in 1997. In an interview which Mr. Heller had with the journal Contemporary Literature in 1998, he was asked ¿Were you thinking of Homer¿s ending when you wrote the conclusion to Catch-22?¿ He replied, ¿Very much so.¿ This study offers a strong argument for an original interpretation of the intriguing relationship between Catch-22 and the Iliad.

http://www.amazon.com/Achilles-Yossarian-Confusion-Interpretation-Catch-22/dp/1438943571?SubscriptionId=AKIAJRRWTH346WSPOAFQ&prabook0b-20&linkCode=sp1&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=1438943571

(Achilles and Yossarian: Clarity and Confusion in the Interpretation of the Iliad and Catch-22) Author: Leon Golden published on (January, 2009)

http://www.amazon.com/Achilles-Yossarian-Confusion-Interpretation-published/dp/B00Y31D72U?SubscriptionId=AKIAJRRWTH346WSPOAFQ&prabook0b-20&linkCode=sp1&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=B00Y31D72U